Michael Jackson's ex-wife, Debbie Rowe, has accused the singer of abducting their two children, according to TMZ.com.

 

The site reports that Rowe filed papers Monday in a secret hearing held near Palm Springs making the accusations. She has filed a custody suit against the singer, which is being handled through private arbitration, according to the site.

 

Source: MSNBC.com

I always thought that woman was a little too crazy about Michael. She can pretty much say what she wants but I'm tired of hearing about MJ and the court in the same sentence. She just wants a part of Michael with her everywhere she goes. That's all I feel to say.

crazy aint the word MJ would never abduct children the storys fake like anything else they make up urgh that woman honestly

I think it's a story the tabloids made up but if you were Debbie and Your ex-husband took of with your kids, you would be a little bit worried, wouldn't you? Especially with all the rumours going around that he's gonna live there permanantly on some island.

How can Michael abduct his own kids when they live with him , and they are in his custody

Edited December 21, 200520 yr by mjj_jdj

How can Michael abduct his own kids when they live with him , and they are in his custody

 

Exactly what I'm wondering. Either this story is total bull, or Debbie is one crazy a....

crazy becuz she handed custody to Michael for his 2 kids when they were born so how can she accuse him of abducting them

I think Debbie is obsessed with michael. OVERLY OBSESSED and i always said and thought that. No woman in the right mind would give up her kids to anyone! No woman in the right mind would even want to have kids with a guy who wants them all to himselve and not let he see them. Thats just crazy.

 

If she isn't crazy, then she is just one shallow lady.

Edited December 21, 200520 yr by The Grinch

I think you lot are too quick to jump down Debbies throat, the last two or three stories with claims coming from her have been denied by both her and her lawyers, just because she gave up her kids doesnt mean shes making up all this bull ****.

I think you lot are too quick to jump down Debbies throat, the last two or three stories with claims coming from her have been denied by both her and her lawyers, just because she gave up her kids doesnt mean shes making up all this bull ****.

 

 

i didnt even judge her upon those stories. I judged her upon just giving up her kids to someone.

THAT SHE DID DO.

I always thought that woman was a little too crazy about Michael. She can pretty much say what she wants but I'm tired of hearing about MJ and the court in the same sentence. She just wants a part of Michael with her everywhere she goes. That's all I feel to say.

 

Man!What some people will continue to say to keep Michael Jackson in the News.I do not for a tiny second believe this.That Debbie Rowe. I cannot even find the words to describe her.Maybe I can use your words...Ebony Eyes?This woman probably is crazy

I don't think it's true you guys. 6 months ago she was sitting there crying in court telling everyone how great Michael is. I think the news have made it a bigger deal then it really is. Debbie knows the children are safe with Michael.

I'll ask any girl on this forum if she would be willing to give her kids or future kids to Michael and never have contact with them.

Im pretty sure alot of you would be like "thats damn crazy!"

Millions of women give up their kids ie adoption. Debbie Rowe always knew that she was doing this for Michael. From the very beggining she trusted Michael to have full custody of them. It will be unfair to the children to have to lose their father and stay with someone they barely even know. I doubt Debbie would be able to do that to the children and to Michael. I can understand if the children are being harmed in any way, but they're not.

Millions of women give up their kids ie adoption. Debbie Rowe always knew that she was doing this for Michael. From the very beggining she trusted Michael to have full custody of them. It will be unfair to the children to have to lose their father and stay with someone they barely even know. I doubt Debbie would be able to do that to the children and to Michael. I can understand if the children are being harmed in any way, but they're not.

 

 

i find adoption very selfish also. I doubt she'd do it for anyone else.

i seen this lady on tv and how she acts. but we are alll allowed to have our own opinions.